California fire not sparked by defective cellphone battery
Just two days ago California fire department authorities pinned the blame of damaging hotel fire on a malfunctioning cellphone battery, but after further inspection, it seems that the mobile's battery isn't the culprit after all. Engineers from 2125i could not have sparked the blaze that resulted in $75,000 worth of property damage and severe burns to Luis. Upon testing the phone, they discovered that "the electronic circuitry in the phone was undamaged and that the battery was still functioning," with a Vallejo Fire Department investigator adding that the battery performed flawlessly after surviving the fire, which eliminated it from being a suspect. Unfortunately, it looks as if the real case of the blaze may "have been destroyed in the fire," but thankfully, Mr. Picaso is in "critical but stable condition" in a Sacramento hospital.[Thanks, DeShaun]














Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
Fred @ Jan 18th 2007 10:42PM
2125i == broken link :(
Digital Fury @ Jan 19th 2007 3:45AM
I guess that hotel wont be able to cash-in on a multi-million dollars lawsuit then. As usual it's probably some dork who went to sleep smoking or something like that.
Adam Jaylin @ Jan 19th 2007 11:59PM
You can also guy new handsets with better deals from here: http://www.ukonlinemarket.co.uk/mobile/index.asp